In academic research, it is important to learn how to distinguish between scholarly and popular (non-scholarly) sources. While one can argue the value of both types of sources, the scholarly sources are the ones that are usually preferred when doing academic research.
The following is a table comparing the general features of these two types of sources:
Type of Source |
Scholarly Sources |
Popular Sources |
Contents |
In-Depth, Original Research Usually undergoes peer-review process (see Peer Review for more) |
Current Events, Popular Topics, Interviews
|
Authors |
Experts in the Field (e.g., professors, researchers, etc.) Experts in the subject they are writing about. |
Journalists or Freelance Writers May or may not be subject experts in what they are writing about. |
Writing Level |
Technical language that assumes some level of college education. |
Simple language |
Works Cited |
Almost always has some kind of Works Cited or Reference list to back up what they are writing. |
Rarely documents sources used. |
Examples |
Publishing on the Web is very different than publishing in print — the traditional medium for scientific literature. Anyone can publish a Web page without anyone evaluating the accuracy or quality of the information. Reviews by peers, reviewers, editors, and publishers are not often applied to Web sites.
The sole responsibility for evaluating the scholarly content of a Web site rests with the Web site user.
Traditional evaluation criteria used for print resources and Web specific criteria are both useful as indicators of quality and should considered when examining Web sites.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Authorship: Is the author identified? What are the author’s credentials? For example, does the site include the author's position and institutional affiliation? Is the URL for an educational institution (.edu) or government agency (.gov)?
2. Accuracy: Can the data be verified from other sources? Does the author have an obvious bias?
3. Audience: Is the site intended for scholars or professionals, for lay people, or for students?
4. Currency: Does the Web site include the date it was created and/or updated? Are the links current?
5. Coverage: Does the site state its intended scope? Is it designed to cover an entire subject, or to give detailed information on one aspect?
6. Relative Value: How does it compare to other sources of similar information? Are there other more accurate or complete sources - possibly in print format?
An equal opportunity institution.
Use of this site implies consent with our Usage Policy.
2550 McCarthy Mall
Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA
808-956-7214 (Reference)
808-956-7203 (Circulation)
Library Digital Collections Disclaimer and Copyright information
© University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Library